Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1838

Austin v. Roberts

Austin v. Roberts
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas · Decided September 29, 1838
2 Miles 254

Counsel

Broom, for the rule., C. Ingersoll, contra.

Austin v. Roberts

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.—

The bill on its face does not purport to be drawn by the defendant as an agent of the drawer. And although defendant in his affidavit states that the consideration of the draft was goods sold to, and on the credit of another person, for whom defendant was only agent in the purchase of the goods, yet that circumstance is no defence to an action on the bill. (See 5 M. & S. 345; 7 Taunt. 158; 2 Marsh. 454; 5 Taunt. 749; 1 Marsh. 318; 2 Strange 955.)

Rule absolute.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.