Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1840

Philad. Savings Institution v. Smethurst

Philad. Savings Institution v. Smethurst
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas · Decided December 19, 1840
2 Miles 439

Counsel

T 1. Wharton, for plaintiff., Lex and Meredith, for defendants.

Philad. Savings Institution v. Smethurst

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.—

The attachment of execution is a defence so far as to prevent the plaintiff’s right to recover the debt due. The judgment of the attaching creditor is more than the amount claimed of record by the plaintiff. If it were less, then the de-fence would go to its amount, and the plaintiff would be entitled *442to recover the difference between that and the whole amount of his claim. And this attachment is properly pleadable in abatement of plaintiff’s writ, because it is a collateral defence, not a defence upon the ground that the defendant is not indebted to the plaintiff.

Judgment for defendants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.