James v. Milne

These two cases present the same question. They were argued together. We think the principle decided in Milne’s Appeal, 11 W. N., 330, rules the cases against the plaintiff in error. While that case was in the Orphans’ Court, yet the reason on which it rests applies with equal force to the present cases. Judgment was, therefore, correctly entered in favor of the defendant in error in each case on the reserved question.

Judgment in each case affirmed.