Davis v. Firemen's Pension Fund
Opinion of the Court
— Plaintiff filed his bill of complaint and a rule was granted on defendant to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Before hearing on this rule defendants filed a responsive answer. On the date appointed for hearing, counsel
For the foregoing reasons, we have concluded to decide this matter only on the rule for a preliminary injunction and to leave the final hearing to be held in Court of Common Pleas No. 2.
Decree
And now, to wit, July 29,1938, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that defendants, the Firemen’s Pension Fund of Philadelphia, Charles A. Gill, John C. Cost, Nicholas Knowles, and Charles Catafesta, be and they hereby are restrained and enjoined from submitting to the members of defendant corporation amendments to its bylaws at any times other than at the annual meeting of said corporation in December, unless and until article XIII of said bylaws be properly amended at such meeting in December so as to permit further amendment of the bylaws at other times, or until further order of the court.
This injunction shall become effective upon the filing of an injunction bond by plaintiff in the sum of $500.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.