In re Primary Election of 1938
Opinion of the Court
On July 21, 1939, Romanus J. Buckley filed this petition averring that he is a qualified elector of the City and County of
The county board of elections filed a demurrer to the petition assigning as reasons therefor that the court is without jurisdiction; that petitioner is not such a person as is entitled to the relief prayed for; that it does not appear on the face of the petition that there are any pending prosecutions; that section 309 of the Election Code provides that the county board shall preserve such records for the period of 11 months and that, from the face of the petition and the contents thereof, the court is not warranted in granting relief.
Section 309 of the Election Code, supra, provides: “All documents, papers and records in the office of the county board of elections of each county, including official ballots and the contents of ballot boxes, shall be preserved therein for a period of at least eleven (11) months, and shall be preserved for a greater period if the county board
It is apparent that all documents in the office of the county board of elections, including ballots and the contents of ballot boxes, must be preserved by the county board for the period of 11 months. By the terms of the act this is a mandatory duty. At the expiration of that period of time the custodians of such records are permitted to destroy them unless the county board “has been notified” in writing by the district attorney of a pending prosecution in which these records are necessary as evidence, or by a judge of a court of record before whom there is pending litigation. It is evident that the legislature believed that under ordinary circumstances such records would be unnecessary after the expiration of the designated period of time, and that it would be an unjust burden upon the administration of the department acting as custodian to require them to preserve such records any longer. By the express terms of section 309 the written notice must be delivered before the expiration of 11 months and must relate to litigation or criminal prosecution which is actually pending at that time.
Petitioner suggests that this court by the exercise of its chancery powers may in its discretion exercise this power independently of section 309 of the Election Code. This is not a court of equity nor are the powers vested in the court discretionary. The right to grant the prayer of this petition is limited by the authority conferred in section 309 of the Election Code of June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333. In the opinion of this court the legislature never intended the exercise of the authority granted in this section under circumstances such as are now presented.
For the foregoing reasons this petition filed more than 14 months after the election must be dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.