Greene v. Pilch
Opinion of the Court
— This case is before us on preliminary objections to the second amended bill of complaint.
We conclude that the preliminary objections are good as to that portion of the bill relating to the so-called heirlooms. The bill avers that plaintiff’s decedent, Rebecca Bel 1, had in her possession at the time of her death certain articles of personal jewelry, fur coats, and other wearing apparel, which she had indicated she wished to be distributed in kind among her three children after her death; that the defendant daughter Fannie Pilch and her husband, Albert Pilch, took possession of these articles of personal property after decedent’s death, and are withholding them from the administrator and from the wife’s two brothers. We must accept the averments of the bill as true, and hence, as the articles were in the possession of decedent at her death, the administrator should act through the orphans’ court, whose jurisdiction is exclusive under the circumstances.
As to the averments of the bill setting up an oral trust of the proceeds of real estate, which real estate had been conveyed by decedent in 1934 to defendants in trust, and which was sold by defendants on July 3, 1943, for a cash consideration, we think the objections must be adjudged insufficient and we make that decision. It is averred in the bill that decedent was in possession of the real estate at all times after the conveyance until the sale; she paid all the taxes and other
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.