Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1793

Boyce v. Moore

Boyce v. Moore
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 15, 1793 · Kean
2 U.S. 196 (United States Reports)

Boyce v. Moore

Opinion of the Court

M'Kean, Chief Justice.

Where there is no notary, a protest may be made before a magistrate. The excuse offered in this case, for not making the protest at the first port, would be a very flimsy one, even if proved by indifferent witnesses. Protests are only admitted from necessity; and the rule, which requires that they should be made at the first port, is a good one, to prevent abuses. If it be not practicable to make it at the first port, it must be made at the next, where it is practicable. This protest, therefore, cannot be received as evidence.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.