Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1797

Young v. Hayes

Young v. Hayes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 15, 1797 · Coram, Smith, Yeates
2 Yeates 216

Young v. Hayes

Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s counsel objected, that on this declaration the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. The receiving of the land warrants and surveys was not a consideration to raise a debt or promise. General indebitatus assumpsit will lie only where debt lies. Here the remedy should have been by special assumpsit, as in the case of the recovery of money won at play. 6 Mod. 128, 129. 12 Mod. 69.

The court declaring the same opinion, the plaintiff suffered a nonsuit

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.