Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1798

Filler v. Harmon

Filler v. Harmon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 15, 1798
2 Yeates 280

Filler v. Harmon

Opinion of the Court

Sed pro quer.

We cannot receive such counter-affidavit, under the act of assembly, passed 20th March 1724-5. Dall St. Laws, 225. It is analogous to a question of bail, (2 Stra. 1757. 1 Wils. 888. 2 Burr. 2017. 1 Term Rep. 717) in the king’s bench, where when the affidavit of a debt is positive, no contradictory proof is permitted to be given. Neither is it absolutely necessary, though it may be prudent to make such demand in writing under the act.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.