Austin v. Ingham
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Austin v. Ingham, 4 Yeates 346 (Pa. 1807)
Yeates
Austin v. Ingham
Opinion of the Court
Unquestionably the intention of the legislature was, that formal objections which do not go to the merits of the controversy, shall not be readily listened to. But I can discover their meaning no otherwise, than by their words. It is clear, that the expressions go no further than to permit an amendment of the declaration or statement, and of an alteration of the plea or defence ; and I do not feel myself warranted to extend them by construction.
The motion was denied ; and the jury were dismissed by the court from giving a verdict.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William Austin, indorsee of Isaac Teasdale against Jonas Ingham
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published