Moore v. Wait

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Moore v. Wait, 1 Binn. 219 (Pa. 1807)
1807 Pa. LEXIS 52
Brackenridge, Smith, Tilghman, Yeates

Moore v. Wait

Opinion of the Court

Tilghman C. J.

The jurisdiction of the justice is founded on the act of Assembly; and having exceeded that jurisdiction, the judgment is erroneous. On the appeal every objection on the law or the merits was open to the appellant; and it appearing to the Common Pleas on the face of the record that the judgment of the justice was erroneous, it was their duty to arrest the judgment, although this matter was not pleaded.

Yeates J. and Smith J. concurred.

Concurring Opinion

Brackenridge J.

concurred with great reluctance. Pie

said his mind was not perfectly satisfied that it was not the defendant’s duty to plead to the jurisdiction, either before the justice or in the Common Pleas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Moore against Wait
Cited By
15 cases
Status
Published