Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1812

Reinouldt v. Aublai

Reinouldt v. Aublai
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 4, 1812
4 Binn. 378; 1812 Pa. LEXIS 7

Reinouldt v. Aublai

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The notice was not sufficient. Where a point is reserved at the trial, the notice is dispensed with. But here was no point reserved. When the Chief Justice in his charge mentioned that if the plaintiff’s counsel should think proper to move for a new trial, the matter might be considered in banc, it did not dispense with the obligation to give notice according to the rule.

Motion rejected.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.