Wellock v. Cowan
Wellock v. Cowan
Opinion of the Court
Set-off had no existence at the common law; relief being had only in equity. Since the statute, this branch of chancery jurisdiction has not been exercised where relief might be had at law; although, for a particular equity not provided for, ehancery will go beyond the statute, and allow of what is called an equitable set-off, by virtue of its original powers. Courts of common law have long exercised the same powers in setting judgments against each other: a matter not provided for in the statute, and therefore constituting perhaps the only equitable jurisdiction which those courts possess. With us equity is administered in the form of law; and, undoubtedly, judgments are frequently reversed for error in the application of legal principles to facts before a jury. But there the error is made apparent on the record, by a bill of exceptions. Here the error is assigned in a summary proceeding not according to the course of the common law; which alone is decisive of the question. In such a case it would be inconvenient, if not impracticable, to judge of the regularity of proceedings which involve the exercise of a legal discretion, guided by facts and circumstances, of which the court in the last resort cannot be judicially apprized; or which, if affidavits were resorted to, it would be incompetent to try. In the exercise of this discretion, a party may, doubtless, suffer injury, without having the means of redress; but so he may in deciding the infinite variety of motions that may be made in the progress of a cause, in regard to which the judges are guided altogether by legal discretion, and
Writ of error quashed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- WELLOCK against COWAN
- Status
- Published