M'Kennan v. Doughman
M'Kennan v. Doughman
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
(His Honor here stated the facts of the case.) The exception to this decision, brings before us the question, (and it is the only one in the cause,) whether the parol evidence offered, was admissible on principles heretofore decided and recognized? It is to be remembered the evidence was not presented to prove what actually passed between the parties, at the time of or immediately before the execution and delivery of the bonds and deed; nor to prove any trick, or fraud practiced by the grantor, nor - any mistake by the person who drew the bonds or deed. It was offered on the broad ground, to show, that a few daysbefore the bonds and deed were executed, some parol agreement was made between the parties, by which MlKennan was to patent the land. It does not appear, that any thing was said by the parties on the subject,
Judgment reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded--
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PATRICK M'KENNAN and JAMES HENDERSON against STEPHEN DOUGHMAN
- Status
- Published