Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836

Cammann v. Hind

Cammann v. Hind
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided February 6, 1836
1 Whart. 320; 1836 Pa. LEXIS 202

Cammann v. Hind

Opinion of the Court

But,

by the Court,

(without hearing Mr. C. J. Ingersoll, for the plaintiff.) These affidavits taken together make out a sufficient case, to justify us in refusing bail. It is not necessary to spread out the particulars of the indebtedness, in an action like the present. Besides, it appears that the defendant has acknowledged himself to be indebted to the plaintiff in a sum, which authorises the bail demanded.

Rule discharged.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.