Cammann v. Hind
Cammann v. Hind
1 Whart. 320; 1836 Pa. LEXIS 202
Cammann v. Hind
Opinion of the Court
But,
(without hearing Mr. C. J. Ingersoll, for the plaintiff.) These affidavits taken together make out a sufficient case, to justify us in refusing bail. It is not necessary to spread out the particulars of the indebtedness, in an action like the present. Besides, it appears that the defendant has acknowledged himself to be indebted to the plaintiff in a sum, which authorises the bail demanded.
Rule discharged.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.