Altman v. Klingensmith
Altman v. Klingensmith
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
It is not deemed necessary in this case, to settle definitely every thing mooted in the argument. In England, from whence we took much of our law, the plaintiff or his attorney pays the costs on each item as the issue proceeds; hence, when the plaintiff recovers, the costs are called his costs, and are his; they are sometimes called by the name of damages, and perhaps might be included in a satisfaction of his debt. The officers of the court have no claim to them or interest in them. But in this state, in most of the counties, they are not paid during the progress of the cause. The costs, when collected by the sheriff, are by him paid, not to the plaintiff, but to the several officers entitled. By our practice, an execution may issue for costs after the debt is paid; hut it must issue in the name of the plaintiff, though really for the use of the officers; hence, the entry on the record, that debt and interest is paid to plaintiff, is not in this state an entry of full satisfaction on the suit. But still, the execution or scire facias must be in the name of plaintiff in the action; and this on the idea, that the costs are his costs. We do not say, because we are not asked to say, what is the effect of the entry on the docket of debt and interest
Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Altman against Klingensmith
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published