Stevenson's Estate
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- DeVilder's Appeal (Clarion County Court of Common Pleas 1941)
- Estate of Victoria S. Murray, Dec'd. (Pa. Super. Ct. 1931)
- Albright's Estate (Berks County Orphans' Court 1921)
- Young's Estate (Pa. 1902)
- Wilder's Steamship Co. v. The Brigantine "Lurline" (Haw. 1891)
- Stonebreaker v. Short (Pa. 1848)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
— The responsibility which is incurred by the receipt and disbursement of money, is a legitimate subject of compensation; and an unvarying rate per cent., without regard to the magnitude of the sum, will always be a just measure of it, because the responsibility increases in proportion to the amount. It is consequently susceptible of a uniform measure, which we think may be reasonably put at two and a half per cent. Not so the compensation of trouble. The settlement of a very large estate may be the business of a few days, while that of a very small one may occupy as many years; and the compensation for all beyond the responsibility ought to be graduated to the circumstances. What beyond it was there here ? The bulk of the property was readily convertible into cash, and but little of it was outstanding. The thirty or forty items of special service on which stress has been laid, are such as - occur in almost every case, and they are beside, emphatically small. We think them amply remunerated by the additional half per cent, allowed by the Orphans' Court; in whose decree we find nothing to correct.
Decree affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.