Reese v. Waters

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Reese v. Waters, 4 Watts & Serg. 145 (Pa. 1842)

Reese v. Waters

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

— Our Act of 1833 has dispensed with the birth of issue as a constituent of tenancy by the curtesy; and had the husband, in this instance, been an American citizen, he would have been tenant by the curtesy initiate by force of the marriage alone, and seised of a freehold in his own right. The cause, then, is without difficulty so far as it depends on the com.mon law, which forbids an alien to take by purchase for the benefit of any.one but the crown or the commonwealth, or to take at all, where the *146estate would devolve on him by operation of law. It has been expressly decided that an alien cannot be tenant by the curtesy; and the disability which prevents him from being seised in his own right, would equally prevent him from being seised, in right of his wife, of her freehold, whether of inheritance or not of inheritance. Is this disability removed by our Act of 1818, which allows aliens to purchase subject to a limitation as to quantity ? It cannot be doubted that the legislature contemplated a purchase in the ordinary sense of the word, and it would stretch the meaning too far to extend it to a technical purchase, which is such only for purposes of classification under heads treated by commentators. The judge who tried the cause, has shown by authorities which go near to the very point before us, that the verb “ to purchase” is not synonymous, even in its technical sense, if it has any, with the words “ to take by purchase.” We are therefore of opinion that the husband, in this case, had nothing in the land which could be taken in execution. Whether an alien might not be joined with his wife in an action for an injury to her freehold, we are not prepared to say. It would be almost too much to say she might sue as a feme sole; and yet she ought not to be without a remedy. A continuance of this peculiar disability is not recommended by any principle of policy; and the legislature would doubtless put an end to the difficulties of the subject, were it brought before them, by cutting up the root from which they spring.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Reese against Waters
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published