Etter v. Curtis
Etter v. Curtis
Opinion of the Court
— judgment against an infant in a court of record cannot be abated collaterally by the infant as a judgment may by a stranger where it is collusive, the remedy between the parties being by writ of error, and the fact of infancy being triable per pais instead of by inspection. No writ of error lies, however, to remove the judgment of a justice of the peace; and a certiorari would correct no more than errors apparent on the face of it. What, then, does necessity require ? The Common Pleas
Judgment reversed, and venire de novo awarded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.