Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1850

Stephens v. Forsyth

Stephens v. Forsyth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided September 13, 1850
14 Pa. 67; 1850 Pa. LEXIS 163
Stephens v. Forsyth

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

— Per curiam.

— A decree in equity produces its effect by controlling the course of the person, not by controlling a court of law, or any part of its machinery. A party may proceed at law, in the face of an injunction, and the court of law will adjudicate, if he will brave the consequences of the contempt. A court of chancery affects no superiority over any court of law whatever, or its officers; and pretends not to review their proceedings : so that the court, from which process has issued, is the only one to which the sheriff is answerable for the execution of it.

Decree affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.