Ross v. Dysart
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Ross v. Dysart, 24 Pa. 395 (Pa. 1855)
Lowrie
Ross v. Dysart
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The Act of Assembly does not require, on appeals from awards, that the affidavit shall be in writing ; and without such a requirement by Act of Assembly or rule of Court, we cannot declare an unwritten affidavit to be erroneous, and we must presume that the officers administrated it in the form prescribed by law. Such was our decision in a late case at Pittsburgh, Clarke v. Hoag.
The principles appearing in the case of Murray v. Hazlett, 19 State Rep. 357, show that the recognisance is sufficient.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ross versus Dysart
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published