Wright v. Commonwealth
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commonwealth v. McKown (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013)
- George Young, Jr. v. State of Hawaii (9th Cir. 2021)
- Commonwealth v. Giaccio (Pa. 1964)
- Commonwealth v. King (Allegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions 1963)
- Commonwealth v. Ray (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)
- Commonwealth v. Mobley (Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions 1940)
- Commonwealth v. Cohen (Pa. Super. Ct. 1931)
- Strickland v. State (Ga. 1911)
- Commonwealth v. Papsone (Pa. Super. Ct. 1910)
- Miller v. Hastings Borough (Pa. Super. Ct. 1904)
- Commonwealth v. Kocher (Pa. Super. Ct. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment entered in the Supreme Court,
This indictment is for the offence of unlawfully
The objection to the imposition of costs, on the ground that a verdict of not guilty was rendered, is equally futile. We must presume the jury had a good reason for doing so, arising in the conduct of the defendant. And even if the indictment had been so defective that no conviction could have rested upon it, still the right to impose costs existed. This jvas expressly decided, and good reasons stated for the decision, in the Commonwealth v. Tilghman, 4 S. & R. 127.
Sentence of the Quarter Sessions for the costs affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.