Commonwealth ex rel. Drum v. Gaige
Commonwealth ex rel. Drum v. Gaige
94 Pa. 193; 1880 Pa. LEXIS 220
Commonwealth ex rel. Drum v. Gaige
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,
It is unnecessary to decide whether the judgment of the court below, without a service of the writ upon the defendant, was regular, as upon the merits we are of opinion that the relator showed no right under the Constitution and laws to the office held by the defendant, and we affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the learned judge below.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.