Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1884

Lanahan v. Dampman

Lanahan v. Dampman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 13, 1884 · Clark, Gordon, Green, Mercur, Paxson, Sterkett, Trunkey
4 Pennyp. 148

Lanahan v. Dampman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff in error demands a stay of execution under the act of 23d March, 1877, Pardon’s Digest, 2118, without complying with the conditions on which a stay is granted. The act, inter alia, declares “before any person shall be entitled to a stay of execution on real estate levied upon, he shall pay the interest due on the debt, and the interest due upon prior liens thereon.” This he did not do. He, therefore, had' no right to invoke the lenient provisions of the act.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.