Stoke v. McCullough
Stoke v. McCullough
1 Sadler 78
Stoke v. McCullough
Opinion of the Court
■ Marshall had no pecuniary interest in the work. The fact that he had been in the employment of one of the parties as-superintendent of the work did not legally disqualify him from-acting as- an arbitrator. When the agreement permits each-party to select an arbitrator, it may fairly be assumed that each-will select a person who is friendly towards him. The “true-value” was to be ascertained by “competent persons.” The per
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.