Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1885

Laflin & Rand Powder Co. v. Murray

Laflin & Rand Powder Co. v. Murray
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 26, 1885
1 Sadler 171; 1 A. 664; 1885 Pa. LEXIS 661

Laflin & Rand Powder Co. v. Murray

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The assignment of error is not according to rule. The points- and answers referred to- are not quoted tolidem verbis in the-specification. In fact the paper book does not show that any charge was delivered to the jury, but rather an opinion of the court on certain facts stated. It may be that the learned judge-is not correct; but, from the irregular and defective manner in which the case is set forth in the paper book of the plaintiff in-error, we cannot say that the judgment is wrong.

Judgment affirmed. ■

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.