Charles v. Bishoff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Charles v. Bishoff, 1 Sadler 260 (Pa. 1885)
1 A. 572; 1885 Pa. LEXIS 672

Charles v. Bishoff

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The book was not offered in evidence as one of original entries. It was in connection with, and corroborative of, the parol evidence. It was properly received.

If the jury committed an error in returning a verdict for a sum greater than the evidence justified, the corrective power was in the court below. It was an error of fact, which we cannot correct here. There is no error in law.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
William Charles, Plff. in Err. v. Charles Bishoff
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published