Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1885

Charles v. Bishoff

Charles v. Bishoff
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided November 9, 1885
1 Sadler 260; 1 A. 572; 1885 Pa. LEXIS 672

Charles v. Bishoff

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The book was not offered in evidence as one of original entries. It was in connection with, and corroborative of, the parol evidence. It was properly received.

If the jury committed an error in returning a verdict for a sum greater than the evidence justified, the corrective power was in the court below. It was an error of fact, which we cannot correct here. There is no error in law.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.