Lebanon Mutual Fire Ins. v. Hankinson
Lebanon Mutual Fire Ins. v. Hankinson
2 Sadler 141; 3 A. 672
Lebanon Mutual Fire Ins. v. Hankinson
Opinion of the Court
This case was submitted to the jury in a fair and correct charge. They were distinctly told if the change of the railroad track increased the danger of the building to fire so as to increase the rate of insurance, and the insured knew that fact or ought to have known it, they should find a verdict for the company. The verdict therefore establishes the fact that there was no such increased risk. We discover no error in the answers to the points.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.