Henderson v. Maclay
Henderson v. Maclay
3 Sadler 40; 6 A. 52; 1886 Pa. LEXIS 777
Henderson v. Maclay
Opinion of the Court
These two cases were argued together. The main facts are common to both. The cases were tried before the judge, without a jury, under the act of April 22, 1871.
We are clearly of opinion that the learned judge gave a correct construction to the trust deed. Any other would be doing violence to the plain import of its language.
Mrs. Jane E. Henderson paid for the é acres and 109 perches of land, and owned it. The possession of her husband after her death was as tenant by the curtesy only. The possession after-w ards taken and held by Maclay saved the trust under the statute.
Judgment in each case affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.