James v. Crownover
James v. Crownover
3 Sadler 73; 6 A. 42; 1886 Pa. LEXIS 785
James v. Crownover
Opinion of the Court
There was no error in the refusal of the court to strike this judgment from the record. The note upon which it was entered contains an express confession of judgment. Not only did attorneys for the maker of the note appear and confess judgment against him, but the prothonotary also entered judgment on the note against him.
The record showed no such defect or error as to require the court to strike off the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.