Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1886

Murray v. McCarthy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 4, 1886

3 Sadler 383; 18 Week. No. 504; 6 A. 243; 1886 Pa. LEXIS 811

Counsel

Petrikin & McNeil, for plaintiff in error., George B. Orlady, for defendants in error.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We see no error in the admission of evidence nor in refusing to affirm the points submitted by the plaintiff. The jury have found that the execution of the deed and the giving of the mortgage were not one transaction. The execution of the mortgage was an afterthought. It was after the deed had been delivered.

There is no error in the charge of the court.

Judgment affirmed-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.