Broomell v. Anderson
Broomell v. Anderson
5 Sadler 142; 8 A. 764
Broomell v. Anderson
Opinion of the Court
The specification of error is not sustained. The court corwectly held that the plaintiff in error had no interest to protect, in the result of this suit. So far as she is concerned it is solely a proceeding in rem against the property covered by the mortgage. She sustains no such relation to the property that she ■can gain or lose by the judgment in this case.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.