Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887

Beeber v. Papst

Beeber v. Papst
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 31, 1887
5 Sadler 208; 7 A. 748

Beeber v. Papst

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff claimed to recover on certain premium notes alleged to have been given by the defendants to the Lycoming Fire Insurance Company. The evidence shows that the signatures of the defendants to the notes and to the applications were *212forged. They were signed without any authority from the defendants, and the signatures were not ratified by them.

It follows this judgment is right.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.