Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887

De Baril v. Pardo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided April 11, 1887 · Clark, Green, Mebcur, Sterrett, Turnkey

6 Sadler 148; 8 A. 876; 20 Week. No. 65; 1887 Pa. LEXIS 603

Counsel

William Drayton, for plaintiff in error., Richard G. McMurivie, for defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

There is no error in this record. The action of the court in directing the jury to find in favor of the defendant is well sus*164tained by the opinion of the learned judge in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The evidence relating to the letter and its contents was properly rejected.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.