Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1887

Wagle v. Bartley

Wagle v. Bartley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided October 31, 1887 · Gordon, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
8 Sadler 271

Counsel

Austin Clark and David Barclay, for plaintiff in error.—, H. N. Snyder, for defendants in error.

Wagle v. Bartley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We have been unable to discover the material defect in the pleadings in this ease which seems to be so obvious to the learned counsel for the plaintiff in error. The lease is well and properly set out, and its production in evidence established the relation of landlord and tenant between Bartley and Wagle. Nothing was shown on the part of the latter to dissever that relation; and therefore the court below properly instructed the jury that that relation must be taken to continue down to the inception of this suit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.