Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888

Kelly's Appeal

Kelly's Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided January 23, 1888 · Claek, Cujeuam, Gkeen, Paxson, Stekrett, Wileiams
7 Sadler 615; 12 A. 256; 1888 Pa. LEXIS 842

Kelly's Appeal

Opinion of the Court

Peli Cujeuam:

The appellant has failed to convince us that the decree of the . court below was erroneous. The bonds upon which he claimed a dividend were never delivered to him, nor was he at any time • entitled to demand their delivery. This appears so clearly from "the report of the learned auditor that we may well be excused from adding anything to what he has said.

Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.