Allegheny Valley R. R. v. Colwell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Allegheny Valley R. R. v. Colwell, 2 Monag. 300 (Pa. 1888)
15 A. 927; 1888 Pa. LEXIS 817
Allegheny Valley R. R. v. Colwell
Opinion of the Court
The judgment in this case must be affirmed; but, as Colwell was at least passively derelict in knowingly permitting the railroad company to occupy and put its improvements on his land, we agree that it would be inequitable to allow the judgment to work a forfeiture of those improvements. We therefore affirm the judgment, and direct a stay of execution, on payment of costs, for the period of four months; and, in the meantime, the company may proceed to condemn the land, and acquire the right of way in the manner prescribed by the Act of As.sembly in such case made and provided.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Allegheny Valley R. R. Co. v. Colwell
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- While silence on the part of a land-owner, or positive acts, towards a railroad compaiw, in acquiring an easement over his land, may possibly operate as an estoppel of an action of ejectment to assert the legal title, as against the easement, yet the evidence in this case was not sufficient. Where the land-owner is passively derelict, by knowingly permitting the improvements, the court will order a stay of execution, for a certain time, so as to permit condemnation proceedings, and to prevent a forfeiture of the improvements. It seems, that a corporation will be subject to the provision of the constitution of 1838, requiring previous payment or security for land-damages, in a case where an Act of Assembly was passed in 1837, authorizing the construction of a railroad in a certain time, and it expired by limitation, and an Act, subsequent to the constitution of 1838, revived the former Act.