Ditman v. C. B. Cottrell & Sons
Ditman v. C. B. Cottrell & Sons
125 Pa. 606; 17 A. 504; 1889 Pa. LEXIS 757
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commercial Inv. Trust Co. v. Minon (3d Cir. 1939)
- L. C. Smith & Bro. Typewriter Co. v. Alleman (3d Cir. 1912)
- Gotthold v. Crompton & Knowles Loom Works (3d Cir. 1925)
- Walton v. Tepel (3d Cir. 1913)
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Quick (3d Cir. 1910)
- Euwer v. Greer (Pa. Super. Ct. 1905)
- Duhrkop Oven Co. v. Tormay (3d Cir. 1925)
- Scattergood v. Pine Ridge Coal Co. (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1924)
- John F. Byers Machine Co. v. Risher (Pa. Super. Ct. 1910)
- Lippincott v. Scott (Pa. 1901)
- Charles Lippincott & Co. v. Holden (Pa. Super. Ct. 1899)
- Chestnut Street Nat. Bank v. Crompton Loom Works (3d Cir. 1896)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The question here is whether the agreement of December 10, 1885, is a conditional sale or a bailment. The learned • court below ruled that it was a bailment, and we see no error in this. The case comes distinctly within Rowe v. Sharp, 51 Pa. 26, and Enlow v. Klein, 79 Pa. 488, and that line of cases.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.