Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889

Reitze v. Meadville & L. Ry. Co.

Reitze v. Meadville & L. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided May 13, 1889 · McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Pee, Sterrett, Williams
126 Pa. 437; 17 A. 663; 1889 Pa. LEXIS 895

Reitze v. Meadville & L. Ry. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam:

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace. It was brought to recover damages against the defendant company for killing a horse. Upon appeal to the Common Pleas it expanded into a breach of contract for not maintaining a fence along the right of way or road of the company. While it is true that, upon an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, the case is tried de novo, it is also true the cause of action must remain the same. This has been the law since Moore v. Wait, 1 Binn. 219. The judgment of nonsuit was properly entered.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.