Watson v. Lukins
Watson v. Lukins
126 Pa. 630; 17 A. 750; 1889 Pa. LEXIS 921
Opinion of the Court
This case does not require discussion. It involved a question of fact, which was submitted to the jury with proper instructions by the learned judge who tried the cause below. There was abundant evidence of the ratification by Watson & Raydure of the act of R. A. Watson in purchasing Mr. Lukins’ interest. It would serve no good purpose to review the numerous assignments of error in detail.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.