Worrall v. Pyle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Worrall v. Pyle, 132 Pa. 529 (Pa. 1890)
19 A. 341; 1890 Pa. LEXIS 847
Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Williams
Worrall v. Pyle
Opinion of the Court
We find no error in this record. If the evidence, the rejection of which is assigned for error, was admissible, which is by no means clear, the defendant below does not appear to have been injured by its rejection, as nearly all that is covered by the exceptions was subsequently admitted, and went to the jury. There is nothing in the case which requires discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THOMAS P. WORRALL v. JOHN J. PYLE
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Although parol testimony, offered 'to re-form a written instrument and excluded, may have been admissible yet if subsequently other testimony is admitted covering about everything contained in the offers refused, the rulings complained of were harmless, and no cause of reversal is shown.