Worrall v. Pyle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Worrall v. Pyle, 132 Pa. 529 (Pa. 1890)
19 A. 341; 1890 Pa. LEXIS 847
Clark, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Williams

Worrall v. Pyle

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

We find no error in this record. If the evidence, the rejection of which is assigned for error, was admissible, which is by no means clear, the defendant below does not appear to have been injured by its rejection, as nearly all that is covered by the exceptions was subsequently admitted, and went to the jury. There is nothing in the case which requires discussion.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
THOMAS P. WORRALL v. JOHN J. PYLE
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Although parol testimony, offered 'to re-form a written instrument and excluded, may have been admissible yet if subsequently other testimony is admitted covering about everything contained in the offers refused, the rulings complained of were harmless, and no cause of reversal is shown.