Kreiner v. Rochester R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 19, 1890

Kreiner v. Rochester R., 135 Pa. 184 (Pa. 1890)

19 A. 934; 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1167

Clark, Collum, Green, Paxson, Williams

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The only assignment of error is to the rejection of the certified copy of the record, No. 17 November Term 1886, of the Common Pleas of Dauphin county. No copy of this record was printed in connection with the assignment, nor does it appear elsewhere in the paper-books. It is almost needless to say *186that we cannot pass upon the legal effect of a record we have never seen. Had the assignment been in conformity to the "Rule of Court, (see Rule XXIV.,) we could have considered it. As there is nothing else in the case, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name: M. L. KREINER v. ROCHESTER ETC. R. CO.
Status: Published
Syllabus: An assignment of error to a refusal by the court below to admit in evidence an exemplification of a record, not setting out the record in compliance with Rule XXIV. of the Supreme Court, will not be considered.