Commonwealth v. Ferguson
Commonwealth v. Ferguson
Opinion of the Court
John Ferguson, the testator, devised and bequeathed to his illegitimate son John Albert Ferguson, an estate amounting to $17,282.97. The only question is whether the estate so given is subject to collateral inheritance tax.' If this were all, there would be no doubt about it. But it appears from the statement of facts agreed upon that on February 18, 1871, an act of assembly was passed which enacted “that John Albert Ferguson, of the township of Independence, in the county of Beaver, be,
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- COMMONWEALTH v. J. A. FERGUSON, EXR.
- Cited By
- 8 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- (a) An act “ to authorize J. F. to adopt J. A. F. as his heir,” provided that “ J. A. F.....is hereby made the heir at law of J. F.,” to be capable of inheriting his estate and property “ as fully, to all intents and purposes, as if he had been begotten by him in lawful wedlock.” J, A. F. was an illegitimate son of J. F.: 1. Said act was an act of adoption, not of legitimation; and a devise to J. A. F. by the will of J. F., dying in 1889, is subject to the collateral inheritance tax imposed by the act of May 6,1887, P. L. 79. Whether, if the act had legitimated the son, the collateral tax would have'been payable, not decided.