Guldin v. Lorah

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Guldin v. Lorah, 141 Pa. 109 (Pa. 1891)
21 A. 504; 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1046
Clark, Green, Paxson, Sterbett, Williams

Guldin v. Lorah

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:'

This was a suit brought by the administratrix of a deceased partner against the surviving partner, to compel an accounting for the partnership assets. The defence interposed was the statute of limitations. No good reason is apparent why it should not be applied in such case, nor why the plaintiff should have waited over seven years before commencing suit. The right to plead the statute in such cases, is distinctly recognized in Hamilton v. Hamilton, 18 Pa. 20; McKelvy’s App., 72 Pa. 413; Everhart’s App., 106 Pa. 349.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
S. E. GULDIN v. G. K. LORAH
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
An action to compel an accounting for partnership assets, brought against a surviving partner more than six years after the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, is barred by the statute of limitations: Hamilton v. Hamilton, 18 Pa. 20; MeKelvy’s App., 72Pa.409; Everhart’s App., 106 Pa. 349.