Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892

Bolton v. Hey

Bolton v. Hey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided March 28, 1892 · Ctjeiam, Green, Heydrick, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
148 Pa. 156; 23 A. 973; 1892 Pa. LEXIS 932

Bolton v. Hey

Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjeiam,

The learned judge of the court below held that the affidavit of defence was sufficient to prevent judgment. In this we think he was right. The case comes directly within the ruling in Schroeder v. Galland, 134 Pa. 277. Indeed, the contract appears to have been drawn with reference to that decision, as its language is identical with the opinion of Mr. Justice G reen. We adhere to the law of that case. It follows that the judgment of the court below must be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.