Holmes v. Neafie & Levy
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Leadville Mining Co. v. Hemphill (Ariz. 1915)
- McMahon v. Pierce (Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas 1972)
- Drennan v. Casanave (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas 1969)
- Lieberman v. Colahan (Pa. 1920)
- McDonald v. Kimmell (Pa. Super. Ct. 1918)
- Gibbons v. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. (Pa. Super. Ct. 1917)
- Samuels v. Luckenbach (Pa. 1903)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We are not convinced that there is anything in either of the specifications of error that requires a reversal of the judgment entered on the verdict in favor of plaintiff. His right to recover depended upon questions of fact which were necessarily for the consideration and determination of the jury. Those questions appear to have been fairly submitted to them under adequate and proper instructions, and the facts, entitling plaintiff to a verdict, must have been found in his favor. Defendants’ points for charge, recited in the 6th to 12th specifications, inclusive, were rightly refused. Neither of the assignments of error is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.