Goldstrohm v. Stinner
Goldstrohm v. Stinner
155 Pa. 28; 25 A. 765; 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1173
Goldstrohm v. Stinner
Opinion of the Court
There is but a single specification of error in this case, and that is to a portion of the charge of the court. We cannot say it contains any serious error. There was but a single question of fact in the case, and that was, whether the plaintiff sold his stock of goods to the defendant, or to his sons. The jury have
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.