Dillon v. Faloon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Dillon v. Faloon, 158 Pa. 468 (Pa. 1893)
27 A. 1082; 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1617
Dean, Green, Mitchell, Sterrett, Thompson, Williams

Dillon v. Faloon

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The facts of this case are substantially like those in Forsythe v. Forsythe, 108 Pa. 129, and furnish a basis for a like judgment. There, as here, a devise was made to a widow for life with an absolute power of testamentary disposition which was exercised; and it was held that the title made by the widow was in fee. The power of testamentary disposition necessarily excluded the life estate given the widow and made her will inoperative unless as an execution of it. Even a general devise of real estate raises a presumption of intention to execute the power, and no recital of the power is necessary: Act June 4, 1879, sec. 3, P. L. 88. There was, therefore, no error in entering judgment, on the case stated, in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
Will — Devise—Testamentary power — Fee simple. Where there is a devise to a widow for life with au absolute power of testamentary disposition, and this power is exercised, the title made by the widow is in fee. Where a person has a power of testamentary disposition over real estate, a general devise of his real estate raises a presumption of intention to execute the power, and no recital of the power is necessary.