Oil City v. Lay
Oil City v. Lay
164 Pa. 370; 30 A. 289; 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1084
Oil City v. Lay
Opinion of the Court
We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in entering judgment' against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. For aught that sufficiently appears in the defendant’s affidavit, the ordinance, under which the curbing and paving were done and lien therefor filed, was valid and binding, and the plaintiff should be permitted to collect the amount thereof.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.