Frutchey v. Lutz
Frutchey v. Lutz
167 Pa. 337; 31 A. 638; 1895 Pa. LEXIS 906
Frutchey v. Lutz
Opinion of the Court
It being conceded that the money attached in the hands of the Scranton Traction Co., garnishee, was due Oliver E. Lutz for wages earned by him as a street car conductor in the employ of said garnishee, the learned judge of the court below rightly held that it was not attachable, even on a judgment based on a claim for wages. There was therefore no error in reversing the proceedings against the garnishee. Neither of the assignments of error is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.